Revenue Recognition & Accounting
How commission hits the financials under ASC 606 and ASC 340-40: capitalization, amortization, deferral, and accrual. The accounting layer Finance is audited on.
This cluster is where sales compensation stops being a payroll question and becomes an accounting one. Under ASC 606 and its companion ASC 340-40, commission is not simply an expense when paid. It is often an asset that must be capitalized and amortized over the period the customer benefits.
Get this layer wrong and the cost is not a rep dispute, it is an audit finding. Most findings in this area trace back to two things: misclassifying which commissions must be capitalized, and running amortization in spreadsheets that cannot survive scale.
The terms below define how commission is recognized, deferred, and accrued so the numbers reconcile when an auditor asks. For the full standard, start with the 2026 ASC 606 guide for finance leaders.
Start with the essentials
Anchor terms in this cluster
Key takeaways
- Under ASC 606 and ASC 340-40, qualifying commissions are capitalized and amortized, not expensed at payout.
- Capitalization has three tests: incremental, recoverable, and a benefit period over one year.
- Accrual records the expense in the period the sale happened, before cash leaves.
- Most audit findings here come from misclassification and spreadsheet amortization.
What does ASC 606 require for commissions?
ASC 606, through ASC 340-40, requires commissions that are a cost to obtain a contract to be capitalized as a deferred commission asset and amortized over the benefit period. What changed from the old standard is summarized in ASC 605 vs ASC 606, and the SaaS specifics in ASC 606 SaaS revenue recognition.
What is the difference between recognition, deferral, and accrual?
Revenue recognition and commission expense recognition decide when a cost appears in the profit and loss statement. A deferred commission holds a capitalized cost on the balance sheet. A commission expense accrual records the cost in the period the sale happened, before the payout leaves.
How does the accrual cycle work?
An accrual is an estimate, so it gets corrected. The cycle runs accrued commission, then reversal, then re-accrual at the right figure. The older umbrella term for this is commission accrual. Timing also depends on whether you recognize on bookings or collections.
Why does this break in spreadsheets?
Amortization schedules, clawback reversals, and capitalization tests compound as contracts change. Spreadsheets hold the first few dozen contracts and then drift, which is where audit findings begin. The operational fix is covered in the ASC 606 commission amortization guide.
All 22 terms in this cluster
Base Salary
Commission Rate
Commission Statement
Earnings Cap
Floor
Guaranteed Pay
Multi-Year Deal Bonus
On-Plan Earnings
OTE (On-Target Earnings)
Paired Quota
Pay Mix
Performance Period
Plan Acceptance
Quota Attainment
Quota Credit
Quota Period
Ramp Period
Sales Quota
Target Compensation
Threshold
Total Compensation
Variable Compensation
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about sales compensation as a topic. For term-specific questions, see the individual term pages.
What are the core components of a sales compensation plan?
Every sales comp plan has four core components: base salary (the guaranteed portion), variable compensation (the performance-based portion), a quota (the target performance level), and rules governing how variable pay is calculated as attainment varies. OTE is the umbrella metric expressing base plus variable at 100% quota.
How is OTE different from total compensation?
OTE includes only base salary plus variable cash commission earned at 100% quota. Total compensation is broader and includes benefits, retirement contributions, equity, signing bonuses, and one-time incentives like SPIFFs. A $200K OTE rep typically has total compensation of $230K–$280K depending on benefits and equity.
What is a typical pay mix in B2B SaaS?
Pay mix varies by role. SDRs typically have 70/30 pay mix (base/variable), AEs 50/50, CSMs 80/20, and Sales Engineers 75/25. Enterprise AEs sometimes move to 60/40 to reflect longer cycles and higher base. The general rule: the more controllable the outcome, the more aggressive the variable.
How often should comp plans be reviewed?
Sales comp plans should be reviewed annually, typically aligned with fiscal year planning. Mid-year changes are strongly discouraged unless the plan is materially broken — retroactive changes erode trust and rarely produce the desired behavior change quickly enough to justify the morale cost.