Commission Structures

The models that turn a closed deal into commission: flat, tiered, progressive, margin, and recurring-revenue structures, and when each one fits.

📚 22 terms
🔄 Last reviewed: May 2026
👤 RevOps · Finance · Sales Leadership

A commission structure is the formula that turns a closed deal into paid commission. It is the most consequential line in a comp plan, because it decides which behavior gets rewarded and how predictable the cost of sales becomes.

Most teams argue about the rate. The rate matters less than the shape of the curve, flat, tiered, or progressive, and the base it runs on, bookings, revenue, or margin. Those two choices move rep behavior far more than the headline percentage.

The terms below define the structures you compare when you design or audit a plan, so a proposal can be judged by how it behaves at 60 percent, 100 percent, and 150 percent of quota, not just at target.

Start with the essentials

Anchor terms in this cluster

The five most-searched and most-foundational terms. New to comp plan design? Read these first.

Key takeaways

  • A commission structure defines the shape of the payout curve, not just the rate.
  • Flat-rate structures are simple but reward volume over profitability.
  • Tiered and progressive structures pay more as attainment rises: they retain top reps but raise cost-of-sales at the top end.
  • Margin-based structures protect profit but need clean cost data.
  • The revenue base you pay on, bookings, collections, MRR, or ARR, matters as much as the rate.

What is a commission structure?

A commission structure is the set of rules that decides how much a rep earns for a result. It combines three things: a rate, a base the rate applies to, and a shape that governs how the rate changes as performance changes.

What are the main types of commission structure?

  • Flat rate: one rate on every dollar. Predictable, but it treats a deal at 40 percent of quota the same as one at 140 percent.
  • Tiered and progressive: the rate steps up as attainment crosses thresholds. The difference in how each treats the dollars below a threshold is covered in tiered vs progressive.
  • Sliding scale: the rate moves continuously with performance instead of in steps.
  • Gross margin commission: pays on profit, not revenue, which enforces discount discipline.
  • Residual and renewal commission: pay on recurring or renewed revenue over time.

Which revenue base should you pay on?

The base changes both behavior and cash risk. Paying on bookings rewards fast but exposes you to churn and non-payment. Paying on collections protects cash but delays the reward. For subscription models, MRR and ARR-based commission tie pay to recurring value. The tradeoff is summarized in bookings vs collections.

How do you choose a structure?

Match the structure to the behavior you want and the data you can trust. If profitability is the risk, pay on margin. If losing top reps is the risk, use accelerating tiers. If cash is the risk, pay on collections. A structure you cannot calculate cleanly every month is the wrong structure, no matter how well it reads on paper. For worked examples of each model, see 10 most effective SaaS sales commission structures.

All 22 terms in this cluster
Alphabetical · 0 Tier 1 · 0 Tier 2 · 0 Tier 3
Base Salary
T1
The fixed, guaranteed portion of compensation paid regardless of performance.
Commission Rate
T2
The percentage of revenue paid as commission — typically 8–12% in SaaS.
Commission Statement
T2
The detailed document showing how a rep's commission was calculated.
Earnings Cap
T3
A maximum limit on commissions a rep can earn in a period.
Floor
T3
A minimum payment level that triggers commission eligibility.
Guaranteed Pay
T3
Compensation paid regardless of performance — usually base salary plus draw.
Multi-Year Deal Bonus
T3
Additional incentive for closing deals with multi-year contract terms.
On-Plan Earnings
T2
Actual earnings when a rep performs at expected attainment levels.
OTE (On-Target Earnings)
T1
Total annual compensation at 100% quota — base plus variable.
Paired Quota
T3
Quota structure where one role's targets mirror another's (e.g., SE to AE).
Pay Mix
T1
The ratio of base to variable in OTE — typically 50/50, 60/40, or 70/30.
Performance Period
T2
The time window over which performance is measured for commission.
Plan Acceptance
T3
The formal sign-off by a rep agreeing to a new comp plan's terms.
Quota Attainment
T2
The percentage of quota a rep has achieved — drives variable pay directly.
Quota Credit
T2
Revenue or value applied toward a rep's quota for a closed deal.
Quota Period
T3
The time horizon a quota covers — usually annual, sometimes quarterly.
Ramp Period
T2
The first months in role with reduced quotas and variable pay.
Sales Quota
T1
The target a rep must hit to earn full OTE.
Target Compensation
T2
Total compensation at target performance — often synonymous with OTE.
Threshold
T2
The minimum attainment level required before commission starts.
Total Compensation
T2
All earnings including base, variable, benefits, and equity.
Variable Compensation
T1
Performance-based pay — commission and bonuses contingent on attainment.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about sales compensation as a topic. For term-specific questions, see the individual term pages.

What are the core components of a sales compensation plan?

Every sales comp plan has four core components: base salary (the guaranteed portion), variable compensation (the performance-based portion), a quota (the target performance level), and rules governing how variable pay is calculated as attainment varies. OTE is the umbrella metric expressing base plus variable at 100% quota.

How is OTE different from total compensation?

OTE includes only base salary plus variable cash commission earned at 100% quota. Total compensation is broader and includes benefits, retirement contributions, equity, signing bonuses, and one-time incentives like SPIFFs. A $200K OTE rep typically has total compensation of $230K–$280K depending on benefits and equity.

What is a typical pay mix in B2B SaaS?

Pay mix varies by role. SDRs typically have 70/30 pay mix (base/variable), AEs 50/50, CSMs 80/20, and Sales Engineers 75/25. Enterprise AEs sometimes move to 60/40 to reflect longer cycles and higher base. The general rule: the more controllable the outcome, the more aggressive the variable.

How often should comp plans be reviewed?

Sales comp plans should be reviewed annually, typically aligned with fiscal year planning. Mid-year changes are strongly discouraged unless the plan is materially broken — retroactive changes erode trust and rarely produce the desired behavior change quickly enough to justify the morale cost.

Go from glossary to working comp plan

Visdum automates every concept in this glossary — OTE calculation, quota tracking, accelerators, clawbacks, and ASC 606 compliance — for high-growth B2B SaaS companies.
See how Visdum works →