When ASC 606 first went into effect, most SaaS companies focused on getting revenue recognition right.
Over time, however, another question has taken center stage: “How should we treat sales commissions under the new standard?”
This isn’t just about ticking a compliance box. How you handle commission costs directly affects your EBITDA smoothing, board reporting, M&A readiness, audit risk, and investor confidence.
In this guide, we’ll walk through the principles of ASC 606 and ASC 340-40 and explain exactly when to amortize commissions, when to expense them, and how to handle the tricky renewal scenarios—all in clear, human-friendly language.
ASC 606 Core Principle: Matching Costs to Revenue
At its heart, ASC 606 is about matching revenue with the costs you incur to generate that revenue.
If you need a refresher on how ASC 606 reshaped subscription revenue handling, check out How ASC 606 Affects SaaS Revenue Recognition.
In short:
- Incremental Cost Criterion: If a commission is only paid because a contract was won—meaning you wouldn’t have paid without that specific deal—it’s “incremental.”
- Benefit Period Criterion: If you recognize the associated revenue over multiple periods (instead of all at once), you should spread the commission cost over that same period.
Put simply:
- If earning a contract directly triggers a commission,
- and that contract’s revenue is recognized over time,
- then you capitalize the commission and amortize it alongside the revenue.
By doing this, your financial statements accurately reflect that you’re matching the commission expense to the revenue it helps generate.
This avoids huge expense spikes in the months when major deals close and provides a clearer picture of profitability.
Why ASC 606 commission amortization Isn’t Just “Box-Checking”?
Deciding whether to amortize commissions is more than following a rule—it has strategic implications:
- EBITDA Smoothing: Amortizing large commissions prevents big hits in months when significant contracts close. Instead of taking a $120,000 expense in a single month, you spread it across twelve months, matching $10,000 a month against $10,000 of revenue.
- Audit Readiness: Auditors increasingly scrutinize how companies handle commission treatment. If your policy isn’t documented or consistently applied, you’re likely to face audit findings or restatements.
- Investor and Board Optics: Investors and board members want reliable, GAAP-aligned financials. Inconsistent commission treatment can raise red flags about your internal controls or financial governance.
In other words, handling commissions correctly under ASC 606 isn’t optional—it’s a strategic necessity.
When You Should Amortize Sales Commissions?
To determine whether a commission must be amortized, ask:
- Is This Commission Incremental to Obtaining a Contract?
If you wouldn’t have paid it without winning the deal, answer “yes.”
- Is the Associated Revenue Recognized Over Multiple Periods?
SaaS subscriptions typically recognize revenue monthly over one, two, or three years rather than all at once.
- Will You Recover That Cost Through Future Cash Flows?
If you expect the customer to generate revenue beyond initial costs—meaning the commission will be recovered via future billings—then it qualifies for capitalization.
If you can answer “yes” to all three, capitalize the cost and amortize it over the period that revenue is recognized. If you answer “no” to any, expense it immediately.
Common Examples of Amortizable Commissions
- New 1-Year SaaS Contract, AE Commission
An account executive (AE) earns a commission when a customer signs a one-year subscription.
- Revenue Treatment: You recognize the $12,000 subscription fee at $1,000 per month over twelve months.
- Amortization: Because the commission is directly tied to winning the contract and revenue comes in monthly, you amortize the commission over twelve months. This treats $1,000 of commission expense each month, matching the $1,000 of revenue recognized.
- Multi-Year SaaS Contract (e.g., 3 Years)
An AE closes a 36-month deal and earns the commission up front.
- Revenue Treatment: That $36,000 total is recognized at $1,000 per month over 36 months.
- Amortization Options:
- Match the Contract Term: Amortize over 36 months, so $1,000 of commission expense each month.
- Match Estimated Customer Life: If your data shows customers typically stay longer—say, five years—you could amortize over 60 months. Just be prepared to justify that assumption to auditors with renewal statistics or customer-lifetime metrics.
- Partner or Reseller Commission
You pay an external partner or reseller a referral fee when they close a deal for you.
- Revenue Treatment: The recognized revenue still follows the customer contract’s term (e.g., 12 or 36 months).
- Amortization: Treat this payment just like an AE commission: capitalize it and spread it over the revenue period, assuming it meets the incremental and recoverability tests.
Choosing the Right Amortization Period
- Initial Contract Term: If you don’t have clear renewal data or renewals are inconsistent, match amortization to the initial term—for example, one year.
- Estimated Customer Life: If you have strong renewal metrics, extend amortization—such as three or five years—using data to support that decision.
- Key Point: Document your rationale. Auditors want to see how you derived that estimated customer-life assumption if it extends beyond the initial term.
When You Should Not Amortize Commissions?
Not all sales payments qualify for capitalization under ASC 606. If a payment doesn’t meet the incremental or recoverability criteria, it’s a period cost and should be expensed immediately.
For a deeper dive into distinguishing between these types of costs, see Is Sales Commission a Period Cost?
Here are some common examples:
- SDR Spiffs for Meetings
Your Sales Development Representative (SDR) earns a $50 spiff every time they book a qualified demo meeting—regardless of whether the deal ever closes.
Treatment: Since they get paid even if no contract is signed, this isn’t incremental to obtaining a contract. Expense it as a period cost right away.
- Sales Manager Overrides
A sales manager gets a bonus based on the team’s quarterly performance, not tied to any single contract.
Treatment: Because this isn’t linked to winning one specific deal, it should be expensed in the quarter it’s earned.
- Commissions on Short-Term Transactional Revenue
You pay a commission on a one-time purchase—like a software add-on or training course—with no ongoing contract.
Treatment: If you recognize revenue in full at the time of sale, you match that by recognizing the commission expense immediately.
How to treat Renewal Commissions in ASC 606?
Renewal commissions often create confusion because renewals can either be treated as new contracts or simply extensions of existing agreements. Here’s how to distinguish:
- Renewal = New Contract (New Performance Obligations)
The renewal includes new pricing, added modules, or extended features—essentially a materially different agreement.
Treatment: Treat it like a brand-new deal. Since you’re earning a commission on new or expanded obligations, capitalize and amortize over the new term.
- Renewal = Continuation of Existing Contract
The renewal simply extends the current subscription at the same price and deliverables, with no changes to what you deliver.
Treatment: You can expense the renewal commission immediately, because there are no new performance obligations that extend the benefit period beyond what was originally promised.
How to Decide
Ask: “Would I have paid this commission if the customer stayed at the same price and service level, without any new deliverables?”
- If the answer is yes: Capitalize and amortize—because the renewal represents new or upgraded revenue.
- If the answer is no: Expense immediately—since it’s simply maintaining the status quo.
Many finance teams default to expensing all renewals for simplicity, but that can lead to audit flags if any renewal truly represents a new contract in substance.
Always review renewals to see if they change the customer’s performance obligations.
Handling Clawbacks and Early Terminations
A customer’s early churn or a contractual clawback clause can disrupt your amortization schedules.
Here’s how to handle these scenarios cleanly:
- Clawback Triggered: If a commission is clawed back—meaning you must return all or part of the payment—reverse the remaining unamortized asset immediately. For example, if you capitalized $12,000 and amortized $6,000 over six months, you’d have $6,000 unamortized. When the clawback happens, write off that $6,000 at once.
- Early Termination Without Clawback: If a customer cancels early and there’s no formal clawback, reassess whether you’ll recover that commission through future revenue.
- If no further revenue is expected: Impair the remaining balance—that is, write it off.
- If some renewal or upsell is likely: You may continue amortization, but update your assumptions and document why you still expect recovery.
Tip: Automating clawbacks and impairments is critical. Manually tracking these adjustments in spreadsheets doesn’t scale and often leads to misstatements or missed journal entries.
Deep dive 👉 Sales Clawbacks: Why You Should Care
How This Affects EBITDA and Financial Optics
Choosing not to amortize commissions can create significant volatility in your financial results. Consider these two scenarios side by side:
- Without Amortization:
- You pay a $120,000 commission in January for a large deal, and expense it all in January.
- EBITDA plunges by $120,000 in that month, even though you’ll recognize the related revenue over the next twelve months.
- Investors and board members see a jagged EBITDA graph and may question what’s causing those swings.
- With Proper Amortization:
- You capitalize the $120,000 commission and spread it over twelve months.
- January’s P&L shows $10,000 of commission expense (matching $10,000 of revenue recognized), smoothing EBITDA.
- The result is a predictable, steady EBITDA curve—building trust with stakeholders and making planning easier.
This smoother profile not only reduces volatility but also strengthens your position when seeking acquisition or presenting to investors.
What Auditors Look for Today
Audit firms are zeroing in on how SaaS companies handle ASC 606 commission treatment. Expect auditors to request:
- Policy Documentation: A formal, written policy explaining which commissions you capitalize, which you expense, and why.
- Consistency of Treatment: Proof that similar commissions (for example, AE commissions versus partner commissions) are handled the same way.
- Support for Amortization Periods: Underlying data—like renewal rates or average customer lifetimes—showing why you chose to amortize over one, three, or five years.
- Reconciliations: A clear reconciliation between your commission-asset balances and your revenue recognition schedules, showing how much remains unamortized at each reporting date.
If you can’t produce these items, you’ll face audit findings—or worse, restatements. In a world where audit scrutiny is intensifying, having a well-structured, documented approach is nonnegotiable.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Even seasoned finance teams make mistakes. Watch out for these traps:
- Treating All Commissions the Same: AEs, SDRs, managers, and partners each have different roles and commission structures. Lumping them together can cause inconsistent treatment.
- Inconsistent Application: If one group’s commissions are amortized while others are expensed, auditors will flag this discrepancy.
- Unsupported Amortization Periods: Extending amortization beyond the contract term without strong data (like a high renewal rate) will draw audit scrutiny.
- Failure to Update Policies: As you introduce new products, new contract tiers, or new incentive programs, revisit your commission-amortization policy to ensure it still applies.
- Manual Tracking in Spreadsheets: Spreadsheets break under volume and complexity. Manual processes often lead to miscalculations, missed clawbacks, or lost journal entries.
Avoiding these pitfalls requires strong policy governance, reliable data, and—ideally—automation.
How to Operationalize This—Without Drowning in Spreadsheets
Many SaaS startups start by tracking commissions in Excel or Google Sheets. That’s fine at low volume, but it quickly becomes unsustainable.
Modern CFOs turn to purpose-built tools to manage commission treatment under ASC 606.
A sales commission automation tool like Visdum can help you:
- Automatically Identify Amortizable Commissions: By linking commission payments to contract data, the system flags exactly which payments meet the incremental and recoverability criteria.
- Generate Amortization Schedules: Instead of manually calculating dozens of journal entries, Visdum creates them automatically based on your defined rules—whether you choose a one-year, three-year, or five-year amortization period.
- Track Clawbacks and Reversals in Real Time: When a deal falls through or a customer churns, Visdum immediately updates the unamortized balance, eliminating manual reconciliations.
- Produce Audit-Ready Reports: Pull standardized reports showing policy compliance, commission-asset balances, and reconciliation details, so you can answer auditors’ questions at the click of a button.
- Scale Effortlessly with Business Growth: As you add new products, partners, and territories, Visdum scales to handle increased commission volume—no additional headcount required.
For a detailed comparison of these solutions, see our Ultimate Guide to ASC 606 Compliance Tools.
Embedding Best Practices into Your Finance Playbook
Beyond choosing the right tool, embed these best practices into your finance operations to ensure consistent, GAAP-aligned commission treatment:
- Formalize Your Policy: Document exactly which commissions get capitalized and which get expensed. Reference your criteria—incremental, multi-period revenue, recoverability—and keep this document updated.
- Educate Stakeholders: Train sales operations, accounting, and FP&A teams on how to code commissions, how to handle renewals, and how to trigger clawbacks. Everyone needs to speak the same language.
- Use Dashboards for Visibility: Build dashboards that show unamortized commission-asset balances, upcoming amortization expenses, and any revisions due to impairments or clawbacks. This makes month-end close smoother and highlights anomalies immediately.
- Conduct Periodic Policy Reviews: At least annually, review your amortization assumptions—customer-lifetime data, renewal rates, and commission structures. Adjust amortization periods if customer behavior shifts.
- Coordinate with Audit Early: Involve your auditors in the conversation before year-end. Walk them through your policy, show them your data, and address any questions. This proactive approach minimizes audit surprises.
As you refine your processes, you might also find value in A Practical Guide to ASC 606 Sales Commissions, which offers step-by-step guidance on setting up capitalizable versus expendable sales incentives policies.
Final Takeaways for CFOs
- Different Commissions, Different Treatment: Always evaluate whether a commission is incremental to obtaining a contract, tied to multi-period revenue, and recoverable through future cash flows.
- Renewals Need Extra Scrutiny: Don’t automatically expense renewal commissions; if they represent new performance obligations, capitalize and amortize.
- Document Everything: Keep a formal policy, back up your amortization periods with data (renewal rates, customer lifetime), and reconcile commission-asset balances each month.
- Smoother Financial Metrics: Properly amortized commissions yield steadier EBITDA, reduce audit risk, and strengthen stakeholder confidence.
- Automation Is Key: Spreadsheets break under complexity. Invest in a solution that ties commission payments to contract data, automates journal entries, and handles clawbacks, so you can focus on strategic finance instead of manual reconciliations.
Ready to Streamline Commission Amortization Under ASC 606?
If you’re prepared to eliminate audit risk, smooth out your EBITDA, and give stakeholders the financial clarity they demand, explore how sales commission software like Visdum can automate this entire process.
Our platform ties commission payments directly to your subscription contracts, generates amortization schedules, handles clawbacks in real time, and produces audit-ready reports—so you can scale without worry.
Next Steps:
If you’re ready to streamline ASC 606 commission amortization — and eliminate audit risk — book a demo with ASC 606 sales commission experts at Visdum.
We help SaaS CFOs stay accurate, compliant, and board-ready — with less manual effort.
.svg){kind=icon}