Progressive Commission
What is progressive commission?
Progressive commission is a structure where each commission rate applies only to the revenue inside its band — not to everything the rep has closed. It works exactly like a progressive income tax: crossing into a higher bracket raises the rate on the next dollar, not on the previous ones.
It is the most common commission structure in practice and the least understood by the people it pays. Most reps assume the opposite — that hitting a higher tier re-rates their whole year — and design their behaviour accordingly.
How progressive commission works
The rate table.
The rep closes $1,300,000 against a $1,000,000 quota — 130% attainment.
What this means?
The rep's effective rate is 9.2% — not 16%, and not 8%. The 16% applied to $100,000, not to $1.3M. Every dollar earned its own rate.
The rep almost certainly expected $208,000 ($1.3M × 16%). The gap between $120,000 and $208,000 is not a calculation error; it is a comprehension gap, and it is the single most common source of "my commission is wrong" tickets in tiered plans.
Progressive vs the alternative
The alternative is a retroactive or cliff structure, where reaching a band applies that rate to all revenue from dollar one. On the same numbers, retroactive application at 16% would pay $208,000 — a 73% increase for the identical performance.
That difference is not a rate difference. It is an application method difference, and it is usually unstated in the plan. See tiered vs progressive commission for the full comparison.
Why progressive commission is the right default
No cliff, no cliff behaviour. In a retroactive plan, a rep at 99.9% attainment earns dramatically less than one at 100.1% — creating an enormous incentive to push a deal across a period boundary or dispute a close date. Progressive plans have no discontinuity, so they have none of that behaviour.
Cost is linear and predictable. Each incremental dollar costs exactly its band's rate. No step functions, no surprise.
It scales to any number of bands without any band becoming a cliff.
The one thing it does not do is feel generous. "You hit the 16% tier" and "you were paid 9.2% overall" are both true, and only one of them is what the rep heard.
Why it matters for finance teams
Progressive commission is the structure that makes commission expense predictable, because it is linear in revenue rather than stepped. It is also the structure most likely to be misunderstood by the reps it pays — which means the finance benefit comes with a communication obligation.
The obligation is not optional. A rep who believes the plan pays 16% on everything and receives 9.2% will not conclude they misread the plan. They will conclude they were shorted.
Common mistakes with progressive commission
1. Not stating that the plan is progressive
One sentence — "each rate applies only to revenue within that band" — prevents the most common commission dispute in existence.
2. Marketing the top rate
"Earn up to 16%!" is technically true and functionally misleading. Almost no rep will ever realise 16% as an effective rate.
3. Never showing the effective rate
The rep's real question is "what did I actually earn as a percentage?" Show 9.2% and the plan becomes comprehensible in one line.
How Visdum handles progressive commission
Visdum holds the rate table as structured plan data with the application method as an explicit setting — progressive or retroactive, chosen deliberately rather than emerging from how a formula was written. Each deal on the rep's statement shows which band it fell into and which rate applied, and the statement shows both the stated rates and the realised effective rate. The rep at 130% sees the $80,000 / $24,000 / $16,000 breakdown and their 9.2% effective rate, so the number is auditable rather than a total they have to trust.
Take a self-guided product tour →, or read tiered vs progressive commission.
Related terms
Tiered Commission · Tiered vs Progressive Commission · Rate Table · Effective Commission Rate · Accelerator
Calculate your OTE in 30 seconds
Frequently asked questions
What is progressive commission?
A structure where each commission rate applies only to the revenue inside its band, not to everything the rep has closed. It works like a progressive income tax: reaching a higher tier raises the rate on the next dollar, not retroactively on the dollars already earned. It is the most common commission structure in use.
How is progressive commission calculated?
Band by band. A rep closing $1.3M against a $1M quota, on a table paying 8% to 100%, 12% from 100–120% and 16% above, earns 8% on the first $1M ($80,000), 12% on the next $200,000 ($24,000), and 16% on the final $100,000 ($16,000) — a total of $120,000, or a 9.2% effective rate.
Does hitting a higher commission tier re-rate everything I've closed?
In a progressive plan, no — and this is the single most common misunderstanding in sales compensation. Reaching the 16% tier means 16% applies to the revenue inside that tier only. Reps who assume otherwise expect $208,000 on the numbers above and receive $120,000, then conclude they were shorted rather than that they misread the plan.
What is the difference between progressive and retroactive commission?
Application method. Progressive (or marginal, or bracket) applies each rate only within its band. Retroactive (or cliff) applies the reached rate to all revenue from the first dollar. On identical performance, retroactive can pay 73% more — which is why the plan document must state which method it uses, and most do not.
Why is progressive commission better than a cliff structure?
Because it has no discontinuity. In a retroactive plan, a rep at 99.9% attainment earns dramatically less than one at 100.1%, which creates a huge incentive to push deals across period boundaries and dispute close dates. Progressive plans have no cliff, so they produce none of that behaviour — and commission expense stays linear in revenue.
What is my effective rate under a progressive plan?
Total commission divided by total revenue closed — which will always sit between the lowest and highest band rates, never at the top one. A rep in the 16% band with a 9.2% effective rate is not being underpaid; they are seeing progressive arithmetic work as designed. Showing the effective rate on the statement makes the plan comprehensible in a single line.