Scaling your finance team isn’t just about growing it.
In a high-growth company, your finance function plays a pivotal role in how fast and how confidently you can move. But there’s a fundamental difference between growth and scale. Growth adds more: more people, more processes, more approvals. Scale means doing more without adding the same amount of effort. And that’s where I’ve seen many companies stumble.
Especially in finance, the old way- more spreadsheets, more hires, more late nights- quickly hits a breaking point. Scaling requires a shift: from manual grunt work to smart, integrated tools. And if you’re dealing with complex processes like ASC 606 revenue recognition or commission payouts? Tooling isn’t just helpful, it’s non-negotiable.
Let’s explore what scaling finance actually means, when you know you're hitting limits, and how to architect the right tech stack to move faster, close cleaner, and gain strategic visibility.
Scaling isn’t just about handling more transactions. It’s about building repeatable and reliable processes that can handle increasing complexity, without linearly increasing headcount. In essence, scaling can be interpreted as managing a larger volume of transactions, more compliance standards, and more payroll activities, with better efficiency, accuracy, and reliability.
Here’s what scaling finance should unlock:
Strategic scaling involves better FP&A, long-range planning, and business partnering.More data and more organization= more insights for better strategization.
Operational scaling means automating the basics such as revenue recognition, commissions, billing, and reconciliations.
“By Series B, finance becomes more than recordkeeping. It's about unlocking decision-making at scale.”
— CFO, SaaS Finance Survey 2024
Scaling finance isn’t about hiring more. It’s about using tools to unlock speed, accuracy, and insights, especially when dealing with ASC 606 revenue recognition and complex commissions. This guide walks you through signs you're ready, tools to consider, and a 90-day plan to make it happen.
Wondering if your finance ops are scalable? Here are the red flags I see often:
Sound familiar? You’re not alone. I’ve seen multiple companies bringing in siloed solutions that don’t work together, bringing in multiple people to improve situations, or getting the help of tools too late.
More headcount might feel like the immediate fix, but its rarely sustainable. When the process itself is broken, no amount of people can join together to anything close to agility and efficiency.
Here’s why tooling wins:
For example, a SaaS finance team using Visdum for commission management can leave sales commission calculation, ASC 606 commission amortization, and report creation to Visdum. On top of this, leadership gets real-time information about the state of sales and sales comp through live dashboards.
What makes this accuracy and clarity possible? Integrations and a focus on ease of use.
Also Read: Are Sales Commission a Period Cost? ASC 606 and ASC 340
If you’re growing fast, ASC 606 isn’t just an accounting rule- it’s a growth bottleneck waiting to happen. Perhaps your business can survive its first year with cash-based accounting, but as soon as you move to accrual-based accounting, which you will have to use to account for recurring revenue in SaaS, things will start breaking.
“69% of finance leaders say ASC 606 has increased the complexity of revenue management and forecasting.”
— PwC 2024 Revenue Recognition Benchmark Survey
Here’s what happens when it’s not handled properly:
📉 Forecasts Break Down
Your burn rate, runway, and growth plans are only as good as your revenue model. If revenue isn’t recognized correctly, your FP&A team is flying blind. That means poor planning, missed hiring windows, and shaky board decks.
💸 Commission Chaos Hurts Sales
If commissions aren’t amortized per ASC 606, reps get paid late, or worse, overpaid, and clawbacks begin. That’s how you lose trust and deal momentum right when you’re scaling headcount.
🚩 You Miss Fundraising Milestones
By Series B, every investor and auditor expects ASC 606 to be clean. If you’re still stitching together spreadsheets, due diligence slows down—and so does your next round.
Must Read: A Practical Guide to ASC 606 Sales Commissions
Let’s break down the tools modern finance teams use—function by function:
Tools: NetSuite, Sage Intacct
When to Upgrade: QuickBooks no longer cuts it after ~$5M ARR or multi-entity needs.
Tools: Visdum
When to Adopt: If you’re delaying closes due to commission disputes or struggling with ASC 606 allocation.
Tools: Maxio, Zenskar
When to Use: For multi-year contracts, usage-based billing, or ASC 606 complexity.
Tools: Mosaic, Pigment
When to Implement: When Excel slows down planning and forecast models become unreliable.
Tools: Gusto, Deel, Rippling
When to Scale: Once you hire cross-border or need better org-wide visibility.
Tools: Ramp, Navan
When to Use: When reimbursements pile up or there’s zero control over employee spend.
Tools: Chargebee, Stripe Billing
When It Matters: When billing delays slow down cash flow or customer disputes escalate.
Here’s a simple framework to choose the right tools:
🔎 Pro Tip: Start with audit blockers like commissions and rev rec as these often create downstream delays.
✅ Pilot First: Always test with power users. Roll out in waves.
Let’s talk about common pitfalls I’ve seen (and lived):
Avoid these mistakes and your finance transformation will actually… transform.
Here’s a fast, realistic plan to get started:
Scaling your finance function isn’t about doing more, it’s about doing better with less.
With the right tools, you:
🚀 Ready to scale commissions and their revenue recognition the right way?
See how Visdum can help →
ASC 606 is a revenue recognition standard that requires companies to recognize revenue when performance obligations are satisfied. For commissions, this means you can’t always expense them immediately—they often need to be amortized over the life of the related contract. This affects how sales incentives are tracked and reported, especially in SaaS and subscription businesses.
Under ASC 606, incremental commission costs must be capitalized and amortized over the expected customer relationship period. This typically requires:
Startups should begin ASC 606 compliance:
Improper revenue recognition causes:
Commission payouts directly impact revenue recognition because they’re considered contract acquisition costs. Misalignment between sales comp data and revenue schedules leads to:
Top tools include:
ASC 606 compliance is often a checklist item in Series B+ audits or M&A due diligence. Auditors look for:
Spreadsheets:
The key is:
Day 1–30
→ Map close + commission workflows
→ Identify manual choke points
→ Review ASC 606 risk zones
Day 31–60
→ Shortlist tools (Visdum, Maxio, Sage)
→ Involve users + pilot core functions
Day 61–90
→ Implement tooling
→ Set KPIs (close time, payout cycle, audit prep)
→ Review monthly